
Do We Still Need Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) in 2025?
Table of Contents
Progressive Web Apps were supposed to be the simple, elegant middle path: one codebase, lower cost, native-like installability, offline behavior and push notifications — without the App Store headaches. Fast forward to 2025 and the question keeps coming back: do PWAs still deserve a spot in your product roadmap? Short answer: yes — but only for the right products and with clear expectations.
Below I’ll walk through the practical case for PWAs in 2025, the technical and platform caveats you must know, what developers and product teams are actually saying, and a pragmatic decision checklist so you can choose the right path for your app.
Need Fast Hosting? I Use Hostinger Business
This site runs on the Business Hosting Plan. It handles high traffic, includes NVMe storage, and makes my pages load instantly.
Get Up to 75% Off Hostinger →⚡ 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee
Why PWAs Still Hold Their Ground
PWAs aren’t a silver bullet, but when applied in the right contexts, they continue to offer undeniable benefits:
- Reach without barriers: A PWA is just a link. No app store approval, no device restrictions — if you can share a URL, people can use your app. This frictionless reach is something native apps can’t fully replicate.
- Lower upfront costs: For startups and smaller teams, building a single PWA instead of separate iOS and Android apps can shave off months of development and significant expenses. Developers on community forums still point this out as a major reason many early-stage products go web-first.
- SEO and shareability: Because PWAs live on the web, they can rank in search results and spread through backlinks. That discoverability is gold for businesses where visibility matters more than hardware integration.
It’s not surprising that businesses in publishing, e-commerce, and marketplaces still choose PWAs. Many agencies writing about PWAs in 2024–2025 reaffirm that they remain a cost-effective entry point for digital products.
If you want more details on this topic, then download the pdf below(login required)
Download for Free!Technical Strengths That Still Matter
Under the hood, PWAs are powered by features that remain just as useful today:
- Service workers enable offline usage and faster load times — a must-have when users are on patchy networks. For something like a news site or an online store, this can make the difference between a bounce and a conversion.
- Web App Manifests give users a native-like experience, from splash screens to home screen installation. It’s not identical to the App Store process, but it reduces friction for loyal users.
- Framework support has matured. Tools like Next.js make it easier to add PWA capabilities without heavy lifting. Developers often mention how this lowers the barrier to entry compared to earlier years.
So yes, the technical promise of PWAs is still very much alive.and adopt progressive enhancement rather than full rewrites.
Where PWAs Still Struggle
Here’s the flip side: PWAs aren’t perfect, and by 2025, their weak spots are well-known.
- Apple’s limits: On iOS, PWAs remain second-class citizens. Push notifications can be unreliable, background processes don’t always work as expected, and some APIs simply aren’t exposed. Developers on Reddit still express frustration about this, calling iOS the “make or break” platform for PWAs.
- Hardware-heavy apps: Games, AR/VR, or apps needing advanced sensors and graphics simply perform better natively. Even as browsers improve, PWAs can’t deliver the same level of responsiveness.
- App store discoverability: In some regions, being in the app store is non-negotiable for credibility and monetization. A PWA won’t replace that advantage.
These challenges explain why most large-scale consumer apps continue to invest in native.
PWA vs Native — Quick Decision Infographic
Choose PWA if…
- Wide reach and SEO are primary goals.
- You need speed-to-market and lower upfront cost.
- Your app is content or transaction driven (news, shop, marketplace).
- Target audience includes low-storage or older devices.
- You want a single codebase and easy updates.
Choose Native if…
- You need the best possible performance and low-latency UX.
- Your product depends on advanced hardware APIs (AR, sensors).
- App Store presence and discovery are central to monetization.
- You require guaranteed background processing and push reliability.
- Your brand experience demands platform polish and animations.
Quick tip: Always test critical flows on iOS devices — Apple remains the most common PWA friction point.
What the Community Actually Says
If you read through developer discussions in 2025, a clear pattern emerges:
- Some engineers swear by PWAs, praising their simplicity, maintainability, and wide reach. They argue most apps don’t need cutting-edge hardware anyway.
- Others are blunt: PWAs will never be native. For apps where performance or brand polish is critical, they don’t even consider them an option.
Product teams and agencies often take the middle ground — PWAs are great for content, marketing, and quick launches, while native is essential for performance-critical or brand-defining experiences.
It’s not an emotional debate anymore; it’s a practical one.
Market signals: PWAs are still growing (but niche choices vary by region and industry)
Market research suggests PWAs remain a growing segment of the mobile/web landscape. Forecasts and market sizing reports show PWAs as a multi-billion dollar market, growing rapidly as more companies prioritize web presence and cost efficiency. That doesn’t imply they’ll replace native apps — it means they’re a growing option for certain problem spaces. Straits Research
Regionally, the appetite varies. In markets with limited app-store uptake or expensive mobile data, PWAs can be a game-changer for adoption. In markets where app stores and in-app payments dominate, native apps still hold advantages.
| Aspect | Progressive Web App (PWA) | Native (iOS / Android) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Strength | Instant reach (URL), SEO, low-friction distribution, fast MVPs. | Maximum performance, full hardware access, App Store ecosystem. |
| Performance & Hardware | Good for typical UI/UX; not ideal for low-latency graphics, AR, or advanced sensors. | Best for games, AR, low-latency audio, camera-heavy features and sensors. |
| Platform Parity | Strong on Android/Chrome; partial/quirky behavior on iOS (push, background tasks). | Consistent OS-level APIs and predictable behavior across releases (with vendor variation managed by native SDKs). |
| Distribution & Discoverability | Discoverable via search, shareable links, no app store gatekeeping. | App stores provide discovery, ratings, and monetization—but involve reviews and submission overhead. |
| Development Cost | Lower initial cost (single web codebase); faster MVPs for small teams. | Higher: separate iOS/Android codebases or one cross-compiled approach with native maintenance. |
| Offline & Resilience | Service workers enable offline-first behaviors and resilient caching strategies. | Native apps can do offline and background sync, and can rely on more advanced OS-level APIs for resilience. |
| Monetization | Works well for commerce/ads/subscriptions; but App Store payments and exposure are missing. | In-app purchases and store-driven monetization are built-in and widely trusted by users. |
| Best Use Cases | Content publishers, e-commerce funnels, marketplaces, and quick demos/MVPs. | High-performance games, AR/VR, native SDK-dependent experiences, and brand flagship apps. |
Tip: consider a hybrid approach — PWA for reach and native modules for platform-critical experiences.
The Market Reality
Despite their limitations, PWAs are not fading away. In fact, market studies show adoption still rising, especially in regions where app store penetration is low or mobile data is expensive. For users with limited storage or older phones, installing a lightweight PWA instead of a heavy native app is a clear win.
Globally, PWAs have carved out a steady niche: they won’t replace native, but they’ll continue powering content-first, commerce-first, and reach-first strategies.
Useful Links
Practical Decision Guide for 2025
If you’re evaluating whether to go PWA in 2025, here’s a simple checklist:
- Audience: Need broad, instant reach? PWA fits.
- Features: Need advanced hardware APIs? Go native.
- Budget: Smaller teams benefit more from PWAs.
- Monetization: If your revenue relies on app store placement, stick with native.
- Market: In emerging regions, PWAs can outperform native for adoption.
Most developers I’ve seen discussing this agree: it’s about matching the tool to the job, not forcing one approach everywhere.
The Hybrid Path Forward
A growing trend in 2025 is hybrid adoption. Teams launch a PWA for speed and SEO, then selectively add native modules where needed — checkout flows, camera integration, or push notifications. Frameworks like Capacitor and Tauri make this flexible.
This blended approach lets companies enjoy the best of both worlds without committing prematurely to a single path.
Practical checklist: When to build a PWA in 2025
Here’s a short practical decision checklist to help product teams decide quickly:
- Audience & reach: If you need instant reach across platforms and SEO matters, PWA has strong benefits.
- Feature requirements: If you need the latest hardware APIs or low-latency audio/graphics, prefer native.
- Budget & team size: Small teams or early-stage startups often get more by building a web-first PWA, then investing in native modules later.
- Monetization model: If your business depends on App Store placements or in-app purchase flows tightly coupled with platform SDKs, native may be better.
- Regional/market needs: In regions where installing from app stores is harder (older devices, lower storage), PWAs often win.
This checklist aligns with engineers’ and product teams’ pragmatic advice across 2024–2025 guides and community discussions.
Architecture patterns I recommend (practical, low-risk)
If you decide a PWA fits your needs, here are patterns to consider:
- Progressive rollout: PWA-first for public content, then selective native wrappers or native modules for performance-critical screens (cart checkout, native camera flows).
- Hybrid approach: Use trusted frameworks (Next.js for PWA logic, Capacitor or Tauri if you later need to wrap web code in native shells). That leaves you flexible to ship web-first and add native near-term. Several agencies recommend this path in 2025 analysis.
- Feature-gating by platform: Provide equivalent but not identical features across web and native: progressive enhancement is your friend—if a device supports a capability, enable it; otherwise provide a fallback.
Cost/ROI case: numbers and expectations
Multiple industry write-ups show PWA development often reduces initial development time and cost compared to parallel native builds. For example, agency analyses and comparison tables from 2024–2025 demonstrate that for MVPs and content sites, PWAs deliver faster time-to-market and lower initial TCO. However, the total cost of ownership can increase later if complex native features are repeatedly bolted on. Plan product roadmaps accordingly.
The Apple variable: why iOS behavior matters
Any realistic assessment must acknowledge Apple’s role. Apple’s platform choices have historically shaped how widely PWAs can be used as a true native alternative. As of 2025, iOS still imposes limits and quirks that make some PWA features less reliable or discoverable there — and the community notices. If your target audience is iPhone-first, test your PWA thoroughly on iOS devices and be prepared to invest in native fallback for key flows. Community threads and analyses repeatedly point to iOS as the stickiest constraint for PWAs.
Examples: who’s using PWAs successfully?
Several well-known brands use PWAs for large parts of their customer-facing experiences (examples and roundups catalog top examples and case studies). These success stories often emphasize conversion rates, engagement improvements, and loading speed improvements after PWA adoption. If you want a list of concrete examples to benchmark against, there are curated roundups showing dozens of PWA case studies in 2024–2025.
The future: where PWAs will be strongest in the next 2–3 years
- Content & commerce: Faster content delivery and lower friction checkout will keep PWAs relevant for news, publishing, retail, and marketplaces.
- Emerging markets: PWAs will continue to help companies reach users where app installs are less common or devices are low-storage.
- Hybrid product strategies: Expect more teams to ship web-first PWAs and selectively add native modules for platform-specific value. Multiple analyses predict this hybrid approach as the pragmatic future.
Final verdict
Do we still need PWAs in 2025? Yes — but with nuance.
- If your product’s primary success metric is reach, fast iteration, SEO, or cost-efficiency, a PWA is a strong bet.
- If your product requires deep hardware integration, ultra-low latency, or the App Store’s discovery/monetization channels, native remains the right choice.
- If you’re reasonable about trade-offs, a web-first PWA that evolves into a hybrid/native model as the product matures is often the most pragmatic path.
Five practical next steps for product teams
- Run a short discovery: map which user journeys need native-only APIs.
- Prototype the primary flow as a PWA and measure real users on both Android and iOS.
- Monitor PWA install/engagement metrics and compare conversion vs native benchmarks.
- If hardware or store presence becomes critical, plan a targeted native module—not a full rewrite.
- Keep a QA matrix for platform differences (specially iOS) and test regularly.
FAQs
1. Are PWAs dead in 2025?
No. PWAs remain relevant for reach-first products (content, e-commerce, marketplaces) and are a cost-effective way to ship fast. They’re not a universal replacement for native apps.
2. Do PWAs work on iPhone?
Yes — but with caveats. iOS supports PWAs, yet some features (push reliability, background tasks, certain hardware APIs) are limited or inconsistent. Test thoroughly on current iOS versions.
3. Can PWAs access device hardware (camera, sensors)?
PWAs can access many web APIs (camera, geolocation, etc.), but access to cutting-edge sensors and platform-specific SDKs is more limited than native apps.
4. When does it make sense to switch from PWA to native?
Switch or add native modules when your product needs ultra-low latency, advanced hardware access, or when App Store presence is essential for discovery or monetization.
5. What’s the best pragmatic approach for teams uncertain which path to choose?
Start web-first with a PWA to validate demand and iterate quickly. If/when platform-specific needs appear, add focused native modules or wrappers rather than rewriting everything.

🚀 Let's Build Something Amazing Together
Hi, I'm Abdul Rehman Khan, founder of Dev Tech Insights & Dark Tech Insights. I specialize in turning ideas into fast, scalable, and modern web solutions. From startups to enterprises, I've helped teams launch products that grow.
- ⚡ Frontend Development (HTML, CSS, JavaScript)
- 📱 MVP Development (from idea to launch)
- 📱 Mobile & Web Apps (React, Next.js, Node.js)
- 📊 Streamlit Dashboards & AI Tools
- 🔍 SEO & Web Performance Optimization
- 🛠️ Custom WordPress & Plugin Development




